Editorial Principles

In the news and explanatory content of Koin Bülteni, the goal is to convey developments in the cryptocurrency field using clear language and verifiable information. Verified facts, source claims, and commentary are kept distinct. This page explains the publishing principles under which readers can evaluate our content.

Transparency of Sources

For technical changes, project documentation and official announcements are primary sources; for numerical data, the relevant data source is used; for legal developments, decision or regulation texts are prioritized. An entity’s own statement is not presented in the same way as an independently verified result. We specify who made the statement and the scope of its validity.

In prices, rates, and amounts, the currency, period, and comparison points are essential. When explaining percentage changes, the starting value used should be clear. Past data and current data, or hypothetical calculations and actual transactions, are never conflated. When calculation examples are used to explain the logic of a topic, they are explicitly labeled as examples.

Distinction Between News, Guides, and Advertising

News reports relay recent developments; guides explain how a concept or process works. The inclusion of a product in the news does not imply a recommendation to use or purchase that product. In guides, relevant limitations and costs are explained alongside the benefits. Uncertain outcomes are never presented with promises of guaranteed profit or success.

Commercial content and advertising spaces are marked so readers can distinguish them. The presence of an advertisement on a page does not mean all claims of the advertiser are part of the news text. Making commercial relationships that may affect the reader’s evaluation visible is fundamental to the distinction between content and advertising.

Clear and Useful Narrative

Technical terms are explained upon first use. Instead of simply telling the reader to “check,” we explain what to check, where, and why. Headlines reflect the questions actually answered within the content. A topic is not expanded with repetitive paragraphs just to make it appear longer; examples and links are chosen to assist the reader with their next question.

Updates and Production Tools

Since technical rules and terms of service can change, updates are made while preserving the context of the old information. Changing a date simply to make content appear new is not the same as a comprehensive information update. For substantial changes, an update date is used, accompanied by an explanatory note when necessary.

Artificial intelligence and other production tools do not replace source verification. Claims, links, numbers, and the language of a draft prepared with a tool are evaluated separately. No person who has not actually contributed is listed as an author or reviewer. Automated market data is also distinguished from human-written explanations and commentary.

Reader Feedback

For information you believe to be incorrect or incomplete, you can use the channels on the Contact page. Including the content link, the relevant sentence, and a verifying source (if available) facilitates the review. How corrections are handled is explained on the Correction and Update Policy page.